U.K. Health Secretary Andy Burnham is warning of doom and gloom if immediate actions aren’t taken by governments to combat climate change:
An analysis carried out by the Met Office’s climate change specialists at the Hadley Centre found that previous estimates about the rate of temperature rise had been too low.
It added that there is a 50 per cent chance that the world average temperature next year will be warmer than in 1998, which is the warmest on record in the Met Office’s 160 years of data.
The predictions came as Mr Burnham warned that global warming posed a serious risk to health.
Well, we all know how reliable and honest these “climate change specialists” are, don’t we. Let’s just say I accept the above 50 percent scenario (I don’t, but let’s say so anyway). That means there’s also a 50 percent chance that next year won’t be warmer than 1998. Either way it’s a crap shoot.
But knowing what we know about the level of fraud these so-called scientists have committed — the global scale of the swindle — how can anyone believe anything the AGW consensus crew says?
Read what Dr. Ross McKitrick told Stephen Taylor:
So in addition to any hearings, what is now needed is: governments rescind any acceptance of the IPCC 3rd and 4th Assessment reports and implement a large-scale independent audit of these reports. We need to know exactly which graphs were doctored, what evidence was deleted, and whether the authors concealed doubts and uncertainties when assembling the text.
Helloooo, calling Mr. Burnham…Got that: you should be rescinding acceptance of this global scam, not plowing full steam ahead to continue the fraud.
It really makes me laugh that anyone in government or the media expects the public to still accept as scientific what these con artists have tried to pull on us. Man, do they think we’re stupid.
UPDATE: Our own Lizzie May, co-author of Global Warming for Dummies, is set to launch a new edition of her book with the revised title “We Were the Dummies” — nah, kidding.
{ 2 comments }
When ever one of these blustering climate crisis buffoons start frothing publicly we should do 2 things:
1) Remember the real perspective and real numbers – to lower the so called AGW emissions to zero ( stopping ALL human industrial activity) would not effect the climate by a full single degree – making all the hoopla about ‘stopping’ AGW moot.
2) In light of the fraudulent science fudged up to fear monger a eco-crisis, these warmists should be openly ridiculed – so should any media that gives them a podium.
Quote: “It really makes me laugh that anyone in government or the media expects the public to still accept as scientific what these con artists have tried to pull on us. Man, do they think we’re stupid.”
Yes, they DO think we’re that stupid. I can’t remember if it was Gorbachev or our (Chairman) Maurice Strong who opined that it would be best (for their nascent environmental/AGW movements) if belief in Global Warming™ could become the next religious movement. They have been uncannily correct in predicting that religious underpinning of environmentalism (or truly Machiavellian in their execution in achieving that). There are still legions of Warmists out there who WANT to believe.
If information was still the domain of governments and the media alone, the eco-propaganda campaign would easily surmount this little disturbance. Goebel had it right: a lie repeated often enough becomes the truth. That’s what Mr. Burnham is banking upon. But they cannot control the internet – dissenting voices cannot be silenced when they are so widely disseminated. The “settled science” meme is dead; the internet will see to that.
Science was never at the heart of Climate Change™ or modern day environmentalism: it was merely a convenient smoke-screen.
Let Mr. Burnham bellow his prophesies of doom; his cause IS dead. Because if there’s still one strong belief system in left in modern, secular society, it is simply anger at being taken for a fool. Once it trickles down to the populace how MUCH they stood to pay for these greenie fantasies, and how much they’ve ALREADY paid; that the whole affair was an orchestrated SCAM, it will delegate the true green believers to where they belong: cranks shouting their prophesies on corner sidewalks.
We may yet see Al Gore and other phony eco-prophets – and hopefully even some politicians – held publicly and legally liable for their actions. If the public anger is deep enough, it will happen (albeit the true financiers and benefactors of eco-catastrophism will simply remain in the shadows and shove popular scapegoats out for public consumption.)
The only sad thing is that true conservationism; true love of nature, true science will be tarred with the same brush, before this all clears.
Comments on this entry are closed.