Boy, that sounds like a winner of a new TV drama, doesn’t it? It should give CSI: Miami a run for its money.
Here’s my favourite screens:
They want to re-examine the raw data? But I thought the raw data had been destroyed…Or has it?
Well, one problem with that NY Times article: It was published October 14, 2009 — before the leak. Is there raw data or isn’t there…I guess only the scammers know for sure.
{ 2 comments }
Two things:
First, to shamelessly plug something I did recently.
Beyond that, I’ve heard some interesting things about this computer code, and to tell you the truth, I don’t really have the computer skills necessary to interpret it. But the things I’ve heard are admittedly pretty damning.
Excellent work, Patrick! The only quibble — I’m certain it was not a hacker who exposed this fraud. I’ll bet any money it was an insider, a whistleblower.
You’re right — the truly damning information is in the code and other documents files. The emails were bad enough, but it’s the data where the really unscientific stuff can be found.
Comments on this entry are closed.